<noframes id="zq0"><progress id="zq0"><progress id="zq0"></progress></progress>
<progress id="zq0"></progress>
<address id="zq0"><cite id="zq0"><i id="zq0"></i></cite></address>
<listing id="zq0"></listing>
<address id="zq0"><cite id="zq0"><ruby id="zq0"></ruby></cite></address>
<progress id="zq0"></progress>
<listing id="zq0"><del id="zq0"><dl id="zq0"></dl></del></listing>
<th id="zq0"></th>
<progress id="zq0"></progress>
<progress id="zq0"></progress><progress id="zq0"><listing id="zq0"></listing></progress>
<menuitem id="zq0"><i id="zq0"></i></menuitem>

Why Nuclear Plants are a safe zone from terrorist attacks

Nuclear power plant

Possible aircraft attack

There has been a lot of contemplation over the consequences of occurrence of an attack by a large aircraft similar to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack in New York. This time the target being a nuclear facility aiming at radioactive materials. Studies show that nuclear reactors would be robust as compared to any other civil installations used to resist such attacks. A thorough study financed by the US department of Energy and conducted by US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that the US reactor would be strong enough to withstand attacks from large commercial aircraft.


Lack of Australian nuclear plant almost immoral: Peter Cosgrove

The Former defence force chief Peter Cosgrove has pleaded for Australia to embrace nuclear power, criticising the “daily scrapping” between politicians about climate change.

Addressing a business breakfast in Perth, General Cosgrove said strong action was crucial and it was “almost immoral” to export uranium to less technologically advanced and stable countries to use in nuclear power plants while refusing to have one in Australia: (more…)

Warming to Nuclear Power

The Age yesterday released an Age/Nielsen poll demonstrating that 49% of Australians believed nuclear should be on the nation’s list of potential power options, with 43% opposed.


This is a major change from a level of just 38% in a 2006 Newspoll, with 51 per cent opposed.


The Real Target is 97%

With all the political talk about emissions targets, it is hard to get a solid reference point.? Here is one such reference.? Taking?the?long term sustainable emissions level from the?Stern Review (UK?Government 2007), we find that a 97% emissions cut will ultimately be?required in Australia’s case.


亚博体育在哪| 亚博体育存款日本十大| 亚博体育下载网址| 亚博体育和bob体育区别| 亚博体育花呗| 亚博体育结算慢| 玩亚博| 亚博买球可靠| yabo亚博| 亚博体育app软件苹果版| 亚博体育投注教程| 亚博体育提款多长时间到账| 亚博体育哪个国家的| 亚博限额| 亚博比赛真伪| 亚博体育官微排名| 亚博体育205| 亚博app苹果版下载通道| 亚博体育和亚博科技| 亚博体育足彩| 亚博体育亚博科技| 亚博中心钱包和体育钱包| 亚博体育网站免费| 亚博体育是谁投资的| 亚博网址| 亚博体育投注记录| 亚博体育电竞| 菲律宾马卡蒂亚博| 亚博博彩下载| 柬埔寨亚博国际张广权| 亚博体育网站竞技十大| 亚博体育ios系统下载| 亚博体育英雄联盟| 亚博体育网址是真的| 亚博体育赌波| 亚博体育足球竞猜| 亚博体育app还能用| 玩亚博非法| 亚博体育app官方下载2.2.2| 亚博官方娱乐| 亚博技术平台| http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc2rfHt/87598.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccJUh5o/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccmIi0o/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccLaHnp/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccCh0gi/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc9qHPq/